In the first chapter of Janet Wolff's
book, 'The Social Production of Art', she approaches the social
nature of artistic creativity from a sociological standpoint. Wolff
applies the social and economic viewpoints of Carl Marx to explain
where creativity stands within Westernized society.
Chapter 1 Key Points:
- The generalized Western ideas and views of artists are that they are people who create art through divine inspiration; artists are glorified for their creative work and are treated like a separate entity of a society.
- A master painter of portraits is no more creative or brilliant than a scientific genius, both shaped by society and the 'capitalist mode of production'.
- The artist, like all people of a culture, are shaped by their culture which is reflected through their creativity.
- Creativity is bound by the artist's social norms, values, and ideological beliefs; therefore creativity is not a product of intellectual freedom because free will essentially does not exist.
- Although creativity of the human mind has it's limits, these limits are malleable, allowing the artist to creatively extend their art past social normalities.
Janet Wolff explains that creative
nature is not just found within an artist. Creativity can be
expressed through the creation and design of everything in our daily
lives; advertisements, our cars, and architecture as examples. Even
though artistic creativity is present in almost every aspect of
society, general stereotypes of the artist and their work being
divine or 'extra-human' creates an unrealistic social status. Wolf
says, “I will argue that many other people are involved in
producing the work, that social and ideological factors determine or
affect the writer/painter's work, and that audiences and readers play
an active and participatory role in creating the finished product.”
The artist is not separate from society but rather tightly entwined
within it. In our present day society, art is a means of economic
growth by being mass produced and sold by the thousands. When an
artist creates and sells their works of art, they are essentially
creating a product, which is not different than a carpenter making a
chair and selling it. When producing their product to make money,
they create something that people will want which shapes their
creativity. Who is to say that a computer software designer is not an
artist. They are making something by having an idea, using tools
and a method to create it, and then presenting it to the rest of society. This is exactly what an 'artist' does.
Great summary. You did especially well putting into words this main idea coming from Wolfe:
ReplyDeleteCreativity is bound by the artist's social norms, values, and ideological beliefs; therefore creativity is not a product of intellectual freedom because free will essentially does not exist.
Wolfe makes the case for this point pretty well. What do YOU think? Is there any way you might want to argue against it (that free will effectively does not exist)? Do you feel like this in your own life?
Nice job Allie.