Barrett- 'Interpretations & Judgement: Controversial Art'

     In all forms of art, whether the artist is a writer, film director, photographer, or painter, a critic's response is essential in how viewers/readers may perceive the work of focus. As a critic, what and how art is described is greatly influenced by the way in which the critic interprets and judges it. Just as how we determine what art may be 'the best of it's time' or even 'the best of it's kind', we determine what art may be the most meaningless, perverse, offensive, and essentially the most controversial; our ideologies (norms, values, and beliefs) control our interpretation and manipulate our response to works of art. Barrett explains this through the interdependence of describing, interpreting, and judging...

Chris Ofili's The Holy Virgin Mary

          "For example, I could say that the culture in which I live informs me that Manet's 'A Bat at the Folies-Bergere' is important (judgement), and when I look at it I see a woman and a bar in front of a mirror (description), but the woman's reflection in the mirror does not make optical sense (interpretation), and therefore I think that Manet's is not a very good painting because it does not accurately portray what I know to be real and, at the minimum, paintings ought to be optically true (judgement)."

     By looking at works of art that have been put under the category of controversial and examining critic and public responses, Barrett identifies the connection between interpretation and judgement.  He pinpoints four categories of controversial artwork and gives key examples of artists and their works that have received negative feedback.


     Religiously Controversial Art-  In October of 1999, an exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum of Art in New York contained a painting by Chris Ofili called, The Holy Virgin Mary. Ofili's Virgin Mary is black with African facial features and is surrounded by cut outs of butts that resemble angel wings. Protestors from the Catholic League stood outside the museum to hand out 'vomit bags'. The controversy went national when the mayor of New York condemned it and demanded the painting to be removed. Ironically the mayor had not seen the painting but claimed it represented "Catholic Bashing" and "Hate Speech". 

Eric Fischl's Birthday Boy

     Sexually Controversial Art-  Painter Eric Fischl has been considered as a quite controversial artist. Some critics love his work and some greatly dislike it. Two of Fishl's paintings, Sleepwalker and Birthday Boy, were removed "in light of American taste and notions of decency" from an episode focusing on American contemporary painters in the American PBS TV series 'American Visions: The Epic History of Art in America' . His painting Birthday Boy show a naked woman with her legs spread towards a naked young boy on a bed. Flam from the Wall Street Journal wrote, "Much of his straightforwardly realistic, sometimes flat-footed, imagery is overtly sexual. And it is also fraught with suggestions of alcoholism, voyeurism, onanism, homosexuality, bestiality and incest - all set smack in the middle of suburban middle-class America."  

Norman Rockwell's Four Freedoms

     Ideologically Controversial Art-  Not all controversial art pertains to social or cultural taboos. Sometimes the controversy is simply critic disagreement on whether or not an artist's work deserves artistic acknowledgment and serious interpretation. The American illustrator Norman Rockwell (1894-1978) created more than 4 thousand images in his life, mostly for magazine covers, and advertisements for campaigns and companies. His Four Freedoms was viewed by over 25 million people during World War II.  Much of his work consisted of American suburban family life, accentuating aspects of social stereotypes that were associated with the idea of 'the American Dream'. Many critics found his works to be bland and too transparent to have received interpreted thought. Whereas with the recent trend in vintage and 'retro' artwork, Rockwell's art has been getting more attention. Laurie Moffatt of 'Newsweek' wrote, "Norman Rockwell reminds us of our humor and humility, our happiness and humanity. Those are not bad qualities to embrace."

Michael Ray Charles' Cut and Paste

     Racially Controversial Art-  There are artists that cause controversy by using explicitly racial and racist subject matter in their artwork to express and raise awareness of social issues that should be addressed. The African American painter, Michael Ray Charles, focuses on stereotypical racist images of blacks within American visual culture which are associated with slavery, southern black folklore, and 19th century minstrel shows. His satirical painting Cut and Paste, asks his viewers to attach stereotypes of choice to a man running down the street.  Football, hair pick, banana, knife, chicken, purse, handgun, or tie? Filmmaker Spike Lee wrote in a catalogue of Charle's work, "Michael Ray Charles attacks some serious issues and with a deft humor, which is very hard to do. He makes you laugh whiles he's killing you. That's a real artist. "Black viewers are frequently the viewers that are most offended by Charles, depending on age and geographic regions, according to Juliette Bowles, a writer for International Review of African American Art. Some critics argue that his artwork, and others like him are "making their reputations and large sums of money off of their own people's suffering, and are repeating monotonous themes to exhaustion, and are catering to the base interest of white curators and collectors."

     By reading through the short summaries of Barrett's four controversies and his examples, there aspects from each type that form the base of artistic controversy. All controversy, artistic or not, has more than one side of interpretation. Aesthetic judgments of art are typically based an individual's or a group of peoples' moral criteria. These moral criteria's contain their norms, values, and beliefs which also contains their emotional and social taboos. What crosses the line of 'comfort' for one person can simply be another person's everyday perception on an aspect of life. For an art critic, when interpreting and responding to a piece of art that encompasses subject matter that could be viewed as rude or offensive, it is important to take in all surrounding point of views on the piece in order to give a well rounded response. Barrett states, "Multiple interpretations of a controversial work of art can bring rationality to a controversy." 

Cannon Dill (AR8)

Cannon Dill's 'Special Delivery'

Cannon Dill's album cover for The Cavities

     Cannon Dill is an illustrator and muralist living and creating artwork in Oakland. His subjects are mostly of animals, typically wolves and foxes; birds seem to have recently made their way into his creativity as of his recent solo show "Heavy Water" at LeQuiVive Gallery. The old and vacant buildings surrounding his home provide him with an industrial canvas, his murals blanket the walls of deserted architecture with radiantly variegated canines. The creatures embody human emotion and physical forms, denoted by the detailed contour lines that shape their mischievous or somber expressions, and elongated human-like limbs.

David Hale's 'Silence'

     Both artists, Cannon Dill and David Hale are similar in that much of their subjects are animals created through dark contour lines. Their illustrations have a very cartoonish look to them, with the exception that Hale's animals stay true to their anatomy. Although Hale's animals are physically realistic, the animals themselves are formed through human designs, tribal mandalas form into a head or body. Dill's animals exhibit many human physical and emotional qualities, as well as the incorporation of subtle tribal-like designs. The beauty of Dill's artwork is his humanoid canines and birds that make us ask, "What is running through their minds?"

Piece from Dill's solo show 'Heavy Water'

Cannon Dill's 'Beyond Lost'

Images of Artworks Provided by:

www.hifructose.com

www.cannondill.com

www.davidhale.org